As we embarked on the journey of bringing our helmet to the hands of testers, the initial feedback highlighted a crucial aspect of its design that needed refinement. While the fit and comfort of the helmet itself received high praise, users noted that the addition of front-mounted night vision goggles introduced a forward weight bias. This imbalance, especially noticeable during extended use, prompted us to revisit our design with a focus on achieving optimal weight distribution.

Identifying the Challenge

The challenge was clear: how do we counterbalance the weight of the front-mounted accessories to ensure users can enjoy prolonged periods of use without experiencing neck strain? The solution needed to be innovative and user-friendly.

Internal Adjustments for Balance

Our first step was to enhance the helmet's interior features. We added features between the rear plate and its cover, allowing for the addition of up to 6 ounces of weight. This internal weighting system was designed to counteract the forward pull from the goggles, thereby maintaining the helmet's center of gravity and significantly improving comfort during extended wear.

This internal solution was subtle, maintaining the sleek profile of the helmet while providing some weight to achieve the correct balance.

The Development of the Counterweight Box

Recognizing the varying needs of our users, we also developed an additional external counterweight solution that offered flexibility and ease of use. The creation of a counterweight box that attaches to the outside of the rear plate was the answer to providing additional balance customization.

This counterweight box, secured firmly above the tension knob through a combination of magnets and Velcro for added security, comes in two preliminary versions to cater to different user preferences. The first version was designed to fit 10x NATO 5.56 rounds, offering a practical and readily available weighting option. The second version was an empty shell that lends to simpler air travel. The empty cavity allows the user freedom to add weight as they see fit, whether it be through sand, metal weights, or any other suitable material.

Both versions of the counterweight box were engineered for secure attachment to the helmet, ensuring they remained firmly in place during dynamic movements. This external weighting option significantly enhanced user comfort by allowing for longer periods of use with goggles, all while avoiding the discomfort and potential strain associated with an imbalanced load.

The introduction of both internal and external counterweight solutions represented a significant leap forward in our helmet's design. Not only did it address the feedback from our initial users, but it also showcases our commitment to continuous improvement and innovation.

‍